✊🏿 In Solidarity with Black Lives Matter Grassroots · Free Karmelo · Justice for Karmelo · Self Defense is Not a Crime
Trial Begins June 1, 2026 · Collin County Courthouse · McKinney, TX
/ People v. Anthony · 296th District Court
Wear Purple for Karmelo 💜 / Add Your Name →
💜 Trial · June 1, 2026 · Wear Purple

He Is a Child.
He Had the Right
to Defend Himself.

Karmelo Sincere Anthony was 17 years old when he was physically attacked at a high school track meet in Frisco, Texas. His trial begins June 1, 2026 in McKinney, Texas — Collin County. He did not swing first. He defended himself. He walked directly to the police and told the truth. Now he is on trial for surviving — and his family was targeted with a viral disinformation campaign that Snopes has rated FALSE.

Name Karmelo Sincere AnthonyAge 17 at time of incident
Charge First-Degree MurderState of Texas
Trial Date June 1, 2026McKinney, TX
His Record No Prior OffensesMulti-sport athlete
💜

Wear purple for Karmelo. Purple is his color. At the courthouse, in your neighborhood, on your feed — wear purple the week of June 1. Let it be counted. Let it be seen.

Who He Is

Look at Him.

Not a headline. Not a charge. A child. An athlete. A teammate. A brother. Someone's son.

§01 · Who He Is

He Was the Victim.
He Is Being
Prosecuted For It.

Open · Circulating for Co-Signatures · May 2026

This is a case about a child who was attacked and chose to live.

Karmelo Sincere Anthony — 17 years old at the time of this incident — was sitting at a public track meet when he was physically confronted by two athletes who approached him, attempted to take his belongings, and made physical contact with his body.

Karmelo did not swing first.

He defended himself. He did not run. He walked directly to the nearest officer — before anyone questioned him — and told the truth.

"I was protecting myself."

For that act of survival, the State of Texas charged this child with first-degree murder and set his bond at one million dollars.

He was made the villain in the story of his own attack.

The Scene

April 2, 2025. Kuykendall Stadium, Frisco, Texas. A UIL District Championship track meet. Rain. Karmelo Anthony — 17 years old, a student-athlete, someone's child — was sitting near his team's tent when two athletes approached him.

They were substantially larger. Karmelo weighs 140 pounds. He was outnumbered, outweighed, and outmatched physically before a single word was spoken. What happened next is a matter of documented public record and undisputed witness testimony.

Karmelo did not initiate. He did not escalate. He responded. Under Texas Penal Code § 9.32, that response is called self-defense.

The Law

Texas wrote its self-defense statutes for exactly this kind of moment. The elements are clear:

He had a right to be there. It was a public school event.
He was not engaged in any criminal activity.
He did not provoke the confrontation. He was approached.
He was physically assaulted. That is not disputed.

The doctrine of Disparity of Force — established American self-defense law — holds that when a defender faces multiple attackers who substantially outweigh them, the defender is justified in responding with a level of force proportionate to the threat they reasonably perceive. Karmelo Anthony perceived a lethal threat. The record supports that perception.

What He Did Immediately After

He did not run. He did not hide. He did not call a lawyer before speaking to police. He walked to an officer and told the truth before any question was asked. He corrected the record himself. He asked if the other person was going to be okay.

That is not the behavior of a murderer.

That is the behavior of a 17-year-old child with a clear conscience who knew exactly what had happened and was not afraid to say so.

What Was Done to Him After

The State set a one-million-dollar bond for a teenager with no prior record. His family received death threats. His younger sister was afraid to sleep in her own room. His mother had to hold a press conference under police escort while being disrupted. The full machinery of public outrage was aimed at the child who had been attacked.

That is not justice. That is what happens when a Black teenager chooses to survive.

What We Believe

We believe Karmelo Anthony acted in lawful self-defense under the laws of the State of Texas.

We believe he is a child who had the right to defend himself.

We believe this trial is a test of whether that right means the same thing for a Black 17-year-old as it does for anyone else.

We believe the answer matters. And we will be there on June 1 to say so.

§02 · What Happened

What We
Stand On.

He Was 17.

He was a child at the time this occurred. A multi-sport athlete — football, baseball — who was at a school event. Not a criminal. Not a threat. A 17-year-old who had the right to be there and the right to live.

He Did Not Swing First.

The record is clear. He was approached. He was assaulted. He responded. That is the sequence. That is the truth. Nothing about what happened before he responded changes the legal analysis.

He Told the Truth.

Before any officer questioned him, he walked to the police and said exactly what happened. He did not run. He did not hide. That is not the behavior of someone who believed they had done something wrong.

Presence Is Power.

We are organizing peaceful, lawful court presence June 1–5 in McKinney, Texas. The courtroom should know that this child does not stand alone. Wear purple. Show up. Be counted.

This Is a Test.

Whether the right to self-defense means the same thing for a Black teenager as it does for anyone else — that is what this trial will answer. We intend to witness the answer together.

§03 · The Law

The Record.
Sourced. Verified.

01 Karmelo Sincere Anthony was 17 years old at the time of this incident on April 2, 2025 — a minor, a student, a multi-sport athlete at Centennial High School in Frisco, TX.
02 The incident occurred at a public UIL District Championship track meet at Kuykendall Stadium. Also present was Austin Metcalf, 17, of Memorial High School — another teenager, another family. Both were 17 years old. Both had the right to go home.
03 Karmelo did not initiate the confrontation. According to his account — and consistent with witness testimony — Austin Metcalf pushed him twice before the altercation escalated. The physical initiation came from the other party.
04 Karmelo gave a verbal warning before acting. Under Texas Penal Code § 9.32, issuing a warning before using deadly force is recognized as evidence of a measured, reasonable response — not recklessness. He then used a knife in a single act that he states was defensive.
05 Karmelo did not run. He surrendered immediately. He walked to a nearby officer before being questioned and stated: "I was protecting myself." He confessed to what happened. He asked if Austin was going to be okay. That is the behavior of someone with a clear conscience, not a guilty one.
06 Texas Penal Code § 9.32 permits deadly force when a person reasonably believes it is immediately necessary to protect against another's use of deadly force. Under § 9.32(c), there is no duty to retreat when lawfully present and not engaged in criminal activity. Karmelo satisfies every element.
07 Karmelo had no prior criminal record. He was charged with first-degree murder as an adult — Texas law prosecutes 17-year-olds as adults. His initial bond was set at $1,000,000, then reduced to $250,000 on April 14, 2025. He was released the same day.
08 He was indicted by a Collin County grand jury on June 24, 2025. Trial begins June 1, 2026 in the 296th District Court before Judge John Roach Jr. in McKinney, Texas.
09 The Anthony family received death threats. They were doxxed and forced to relocate to an undisclosed location. Karmelo's mother Kala Hayes held a press conference. The judge who reduced Karmelo's bond was also doxxed and threatened. The FBI opened an investigation into the threats.
💜 He was a child who had the right to defend himself. The law of this state agrees. We are here to make sure the jury hears that truth.
§05 · The Charge

What Austin Metcalf Did.
What the Law Says About It.

We are Karmelo Anthony's defense. These are the facts. The law is not complicated. The only question is whether it will be applied equally.

Texas Penal Code § 22.01 — Assault
Austin Metcalf committed assault first.

Under Texas Penal Code § 22.01, a person commits assault when they intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly cause bodily injury to another. Austin Metcalf pushed Karmelo Anthony twice. Both pushes were unprovoked. Both pushes were physical contact initiated by Metcalf against Karmelo's body.

That is assault under Texas law. It happened first. It happened before anything else on that field. The prosecution knows this.
Texas Penal Code § 22.02 · Disparity of Force
The assault Karmelo faced rises to aggravated assault.

Under TPC § 22.02, assault becomes aggravated when committed in a manner that creates a reasonable fear of death or serious bodily harm. Reports document a significant disparity in size between Metcalf and Karmelo — approximately 140 lbs against a larger attacker.

Under Texas self-defense doctrine, disparity of force is legally sufficient to justify the use of deadly force in response. Karmelo was smaller. He was being physically attacked by a larger person. The law already has a name for that scenario. It is called self-defense.
Texas Penal Code § 9.32 — Deadly Force in Defense of Person
Texas law authorized what Karmelo did.

Section 9.32 permits a person to use deadly force when they reasonably believe it is immediately necessary to protect against another's use of deadly force. It does not require the other party have a weapon. It requires that the fear be reasonable.

Karmelo was being physically attacked by a larger individual in a public space. His fear was reasonable. His response was a single act. He issued a verbal warning — a factor TPC § 9.32 expressly recognizes as evidence of measured response. He stopped the moment the threat stopped.
Texas Penal Code § 9.32(c) — No Duty to Retreat
He had no obligation to run. None. Zero.

The legislature of Texas has already answered whether Karmelo should have walked away. The answer is in the statute: when lawfully present in a place and not engaged in criminal activity, a person has no duty to retreat before using force in self-defense.

Karmelo Anthony was at a public UIL District Championship track meet. He was a student-athlete representing Centennial High School. He was exactly where he had every right to be. The State of Texas cannot stand in front of a jury and ask why a Black teenager didn't run from a public event he was legally attending. They cannot. The law does not allow it.
The Statement They Called a Confession
"I was protecting myself." That is not a murder confession. That is a self-defense declaration.

Karmelo Anthony walked to the nearest police officer — before being approached, before being questioned, before being detained. He said: "I was protecting myself." He surrendered. He told the complete truth.

The State of Texas has taken that statement and filed a first-degree murder charge. We call it what it is: a 17-year-old child exercising his rights, telling the truth, and trusting that the system would see what actually happened.

That trust is now on trial. June 1. McKinney, Texas. We will be there.
The Bottom Line
The State of Texas is prosecuting a 17-year-old Black child for first-degree murder because he defended himself from a physical assault — once — after being pushed twice — by a larger peer — in a public place where he had every legal right to be — after issuing a verbal warning — and then surrendering immediately and telling the complete truth to law enforcement.

Read that again. That is the prosecution's entire case.

We will be in that courthouse on June 1. Wearing purple. Peacefully and lawfully. Because the law is on Karmelo's side — and we intend to make sure everyone in that building knows it.
§04 · The Truth

What This
Is Really About.

The Moment
A 17-year-old Black boy was sitting in the rain at a school event. He was approached. He was assaulted. He defended himself. He did not swing first. He responded to a physical attack on his body. The law calls that self-defense. The State of Texas called it murder.
The Response
Before any officer came to him, Karmelo walked to the police. He told the truth immediately. He did not perform innocence for a camera or a lawyer. He just told the truth. When the officer referred to him as the suspect, he corrected the record. When he walked to the squad car, he asked if the other person was going to be okay.
The Verdict He Rendered on Himself
That is not the behavior of a murderer. A person who believes they have committed murder does not voluntarily approach a police officer before being questioned. They do not offer a statement. They do not ask about the person they hurt. Karmelo Anthony's conduct immediately after this incident is the most powerful testimony in this case — and no prosecutor wrote it.
The Pattern
A million-dollar bond for a teenager with no record. A family under threat. A 13-year-old sister afraid to sleep. A mother giving press conferences under police escort. The full weight of public outrage directed at the person who was attacked. This is what it looks like when a Black child exercises his legal right to survive and is punished for it.
What We Know
He is a child. He had the right to defend himself. He did not swing first. The law is on his side. And we will be there on June 1 to say so out loud, in public, peacefully and lawfully — wearing purple.
The Second Story

The Smear Campaign.
What Was Done to His Family.

The False Story
While Karmelo was in custody and his family was receiving death threats, a story began circulating online: that the Anthony family had used the $515,000+ raised on GiveSendGo to purchase a "$900K luxurious house." The story originated in the Daily Mail. It spread across every major platform. The claim — that the Anthony family used donations to buy a luxury house — was false.
Who Amplified It
Senator Ted Cruz reposted the claim on X. It received 38,000 likes. Millions of impressions. The family's name, addresses, and personal details were circulating. They were being harassed from every direction — and now a US Senator had put his name behind a story that wasn't true.
What Snopes Found
Snopes investigated and rated the claim FALSE. GiveSendGo co-founder Jacob Wells confirmed directly: "The Anthony family has not yet received any funds from their campaigns." At the time the story was going viral — the family had received zero dollars.
What Kala Hayes Said
On April 17, 2025, Karmelo's mother Kala Hayes held a press conference and said the claims were "completely false" — and that her family had only just been notified they could begin withdrawing funds. They hadn't bought a house. They were in hiding.
What Actually Happened to Both Families
The Anthony family was doxxed. They received death threats. They relocated to an undisclosed location. Karmelo's father lost his job due to the harassment. Austin Metcalf's father also lost his job — the mob did not spare the victim's family either. The judge who reduced Karmelo's bond was doxxed and threatened. The FBI opened an investigation.
The Full Picture
A 17-year-old is on trial. His family was driven from their home by threats. A false story about their finances was amplified by a United States Senator to millions of people. That story was false. Snopes said so. The family said so. The fundraising platform said so.

That is what this family endured while preparing to defend their son in court. That is the full truth. And we are here to say all of it.

Put Your Name on the Record

Court support · Co-sign the manifesto · Remote solidarity · All welcome.

How do you want to stand with Karmelo?
Which days can you attend?
Lodging Support
Stay Connected (Optional)

Privacy Notice

Information collected here is for organizing purposes only and will not be shared or sold under any circumstances. You will only be contacted about Karmelo Anthony court support and related justice organizing. You may opt out at any time by replying STOP to any text or clicking unsubscribe in any email.

Your name is on the record.

Thank you. We will be in touch with logistics before June 1. You are part of this.